Developing the Improvement Plan
"Planning is what you do before you do something, so that when you do it, it is not all mixed up."
~ Christopher Robin to Winnie the Pooh (A.A. Milne)
This section describes the steps in developing an improvement plan. While there are many ways that a state may choose to develop a written improvement plan, this guide provides the basic steps in improvement planning. A state may complete the steps in a different order, or add or eliminate steps and should use this resource in a way that fits state needs.
During Phase I of the SSIP, states reviewed their data at all levels, assessed their current infrastructure, and developed Coherent Improvement Strategies and a Theory of Action that specifies how the State-Identified Measureable Result (SIMR) will be achieved. Now it is time to put this all into action! An improvement plan for Phase II will provide the details needed to achieve the expected outcomes and make progress toward achieving the state's SIMR.
Improvement planning is an organizational management activity that is used to:
- Set priorities
- Focus energy and resources
- Ensure that internal and external stakeholders are working toward common goals
- Establish agreement on intended outcomes/results implementation
Planning occurs all the time, both informally and formally. Effective improvement planning is intentional and provides an opportunity to assess the current status, determine if what is being done needs to be done, and decide where to go in the future. Improvement planning involves setting priorities, assessing internal and external resources, and engaging all interested parties in defining the activities, desired outcomes, and implementing/revising improvement strategies as needed to achieve the SIMR.
In Phase II, developing the written plan will provide states with the structure and detail needed to achieve the SIMR through implementation of the improvement strategies. Including stakeholders, key partners, and staff in this process ensures that all perspectives are represented. The evaluation measures provide the feedback needed to track progress and make needed adjustments.
The improvement plan must address improving the infrastructure and how the state will support EIS programs and/or EIS providers in implementing the evidence-based practices. It should include the following:
- Activities and steps that will be implemented, who is responsible, and according to what timelines
- Resources needed for each activity
- Leverage points and partners from within the lead agency and other initiatives and agencies
- Communication strategies and stakeholder involvement
- How identified barriers in the infrastructure will be addressed
- How activities will be implemented with fidelity
- Procedures for monitoring the plan's implementation and strategies, timeframe for plan evaluation, and modifications, if needed, to ensure progress toward desired outcomes is achieved.
Improvement Plans answer the following questions:
- Where are we now? Use this opportunity to review the current environment and clarify the vison, mission, and purpose.
- Where are we going? Think ahead several years to assure consistency and alignment with the direction the organization is headed.
- What will achievement of the SIMR look like? Identify the expected short, intermediate, and long-term outcomes that will result from achieving the SIMR.
- How will we get there? Lay out the road to connect current activities with future desired goals. Develop an improvement plan with clearly defined activities.
- How will we know we've been successful? Determine benchmarks of success. Develop an evaluation plan that leads to improving and adjusting the activities to ensure a dynamic and responsive process is in place to achieve the SIMR and the intended outcomes.
Other questions to consider include the following:
- What actions or changes will occur?
- Who will carry out these changes?
- When will the changes will take place, and for how long?
- What resources are needed to carry out the activity (e.g., staff, funding, supplies)?
- How will the improvement plan be communicated to stakeholders, the public, providers, and families?
- How will input be provided to make needed adjustments to the improvement plan?
Step 1. Convene the core staff and/or stakeholders responsible for the written plan. Core staff/stakeholders responsible for the written improvement plan might represent various levels of the system and offer expertise in a broad range of areas.
Purpose
- Develop a process for collecting and compiling information for the improvement plan.
- Identify fiscal and human resources available for planning and/or implementation of the SSIP.
Step 2. Determine timeline and responsibilities for developing the written improvement plan.
Purpose
- Develop a timeline to ensure submission to OSEP by April 1.
- Assign responsibility for completing assignments.
Step 3. Establish the process for developing the improvement plan, including meeting schedule, agenda format, and a format for documenting and sharing decisions made in planning meetings.
Purpose
- Ensure that information provided to planning groups is consistent.
- Ensure that information needed for the written improvement plan is collected.
Step 4. Determine how stakeholders, staff, and partners will be engaged and organized to provide input for the improvement plan.
Purpose
- Ensure that stakeholders, staff, and partners actively engage in developing the improvement plan.
- Provide clear expectations on how improvement plan will be developed.
- Assign responsibility for completing assignments.
Step 5. Determine communication protocols to coordinate communication (for the internal group actively engaged in developing the improvement plan) at all levels during the planning process.
Purpose
- Ensure that communication occurs across all levels.
- Ensure that all members working on developing the improvement plan are in communication loop.
Step 6. Establish protocols for communicating with key external stakeholders who are not actively engaged in developing the written plan.
Purpose
- Ensure members of the internal planning team communicate about the improvement plan with other stakeholders in their agency.
- Ensure buy-in for implementation of the SSIP.
Resources
- Template for Strategic Communications Plan (see Step 3: Develop Messages)
Step 7. Review the state's or program's vision, mission, and purpose, if appropriate.
Purpose
- Ensure alignment of SSIP with state or agency priorities.
Step 8. Provide brief overview of the Theory of Action (TOA) and Improvement Strategies developed in Phase I. This may need to be repeated at each meeting.
Purpose
- Ensure planning team members are familiar with the TOA and Improvement Strategies.
- Keep planners focused on how their work fits into the larger SSIP.
Resources
- State Theory of Action
- State Improvement Strategies
- State logic model, if developed
Step 9. Review and identify evidence-based programs, practices, or approaches that would be expected to positively impact the SIMR. This review will yield a set of practices, potential programs, or approaches and infrastructure improvements to be considered by planners.
Purpose
- Ensure program, practices, or approaches align with TOA.
- Define the set of evidence- based programs, practices, or approaches to be considered by planning teams.
- Define the activities to be completed to strengthen the infrastructure for improving practices, programs, or approaches.
Step 10. Review, discuss, and select potential practices or programs in relation to need, fit, resources–sustainability, strength of evidence, readiness for replication and capacity to implement.
Purpose
- Ensure that the practices selected are doable and a good fit.
Step 11. Determine the initial implementation sites for the installation of the evidence-based program or practice.
Purpose
- Ensure that the initial sites are ready for installation.
- Ensure actions are included in the plan addressing capacity of installation sites.
Resources
Step 12. Identify short-term and intermediate outcomes that will need to be achieved to improve the long-term outcome (SIMR).
Purpose
- Ensure the improvement plan activities and steps are designed to achieve outcomes of the SSIP.
- Link the improvement plan with the evaluation plan.
Step 13. Select the format to be used to develop the written implementation plan (e.g., sample template, template of state choice).
Purpose
- Provide document for capturing information throughout the process of developing the written improvement plan.
Step 14. Develop the written improvement plan that identifies how the improvement strategies will be implemented to achieve the short-term, intermediate, and long-term outcomes.
Purpose
- Ensure written improvement plan follows the guidance from OSEP for Phase II.
- Guide implementation of the SSIP work now and in future.
Step 15. Review the written plan to ensure that the activities are Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant, and Timely (SMART).
Purpose
- Ensure that the activities planned can be evaluated.
Step 16. Share the written plan with stakeholders, parents, providers, agency staff, and partners for their review and comment.
Purpose
- Ensure buy-in of staff, stakeholders, and partners.
Resources
- There are no resources listed for this step.
Step 17. Finalize the written plan.
Purpose
- Include a narrative summary of the Phase II development process and detailed improvement plan.
Resources
- There are no resources listed for this step.
Tips
- Planning may take several sessions. Develop drafts for review and input from stakeholders at multiple points in the process.
- An effective improvement strategy may require several actions and related activities to achieve full implementation.
- Remember to address infrastructure. Identify how you will build on the strengths and address the weaknesses identified in Phase I of SSIP development.
- Carefully consider the evidenced-based practices or approaches to be selected. What practices or approaches will most effectively improve outcomes for children and families?
- Consider evaluation and ways to measure change when developing the improvement plan. How will you know activities are implemented with fidelity? How will you know the activities are making the expected difference?
- Criteria for a good improvement plan:
- Aspirational: Does the improvement plan reflect the current work? Are newly emerging opportunities and barriers addressed? Does it address the identified infrastructure issues and provide supports for implementation of evidenced-based practices?
- Complete: Does it list all of the action steps or changes to be sought at all levels of system (e.g., practitioner, district, local program, and state)? Does it include partnerships with other programs and agencies and leverage existing initiatives?
- Clearly define responsibilities and timelines: Is it apparent who will do what, by when?
- Evaluate progress and make adjustments: Does the evaluation plan address the process and impact of implementing improvement strategies?