This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies and similar technologies to understand visitor experiences. By using this website, you consent to UNC-Chapel Hill's cookie usage in accordance with their Privacy Notice.

Improving Systems, Practices, and Outcomes

Module 1: Interaction: References and Acknowledgements

Congratulations!

You have completed Module 1: Interaction.

Suggested Citation

RPM Project (2018). Early Childhood Recommended Practice Modules, Module 1: Interaction. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute. https://ectacenter.org/rpm

References

  1. Center for Early Literacy Learning (2013). Early Childhood Classroom Interests Tool:Infant/Toddler Classrooms. http://www.earlyliteracylearning.org/ta_pdf/ec_classrm_ints_tool.pdf
  2. Center for Early Literacy Learning (2013). Resources. http://www.earlyliteracylearning.org
  3. CONNECT Modules (2009). Handout 1.14 Child Observation Form. CONNECT Module 1:Embedded Interventions. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, FPG Child DevelopmentInstitute. http://community.fpg.unc.edu/sites/community.fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/Activity/CONNECT-Handout-1-14.pdf
  4. Division for Early Childhood (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. https://www.dec-sped.org/dec-recommended-practices
  5. Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center (2018). Practice Improvement Tools: Using the DEC Recommended Practices. https://ectacenter.org/decrp/
  6. Jiron, A., Brogle, B., & Giacomini, J. (2013). How to Understand the Meaning of Your Child's Challenging Behavior. https://challengingbehavior.org/docs/backpack/BackpackConnection_behavior_understand-meaning.pdf
  7. McCollum, J. (2015). From qualities of interaction to intervention practices: Using what comes naturally. Division of Early Childhood, DEC Recommended Practices: Enhancing services for Young Children with Disabilities and Their Families (pp. 87–98). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
  8. Technical Assistance Center on Social Emotional Intervention (2011). TACSEI Resources. https://challengingbehavior.org/resources/
  9. Winton, P.J., Buysse, V., Turnbull, A., Rous, B., & Hollingsworth, H. (2010). CONNECT Module 1: Embedded Interventions. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, CONNECT: The Center to Mobilize Early Childhood Knowledge. http://community.fpg.unc.edu/connect-modules/learners/module-1

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge and give special thanks to the following contributors:

  • Jeanette McCollum (subject matter expert)
  • Pam Winton (advisor)
  • Maggie Connolly (subject matter expert for scenario-based activity)

We also give sincere thanks to our Voices from the Field experts:

  • Jeanette McCollum
  • Rashida Banerjee
  • Catherine Corr
  • Samtra Devard

Deep appreciation also to DEC Commission reviewers:

  • Mary McLean
  • Pam Winton
  • Ann Larson
  • Chelsea Guillen
  • Judy Carter

RPM Staff

Principal Investigator

  • Christina Karsprzak, FPG Child Development Institute

Co-Leads

  • Megan Vinh, FPG Child Development Institute
  • Chih-Ing Lim, FPG Child Development Institute

Content Team

  • Allison Jones, Puckett Institute
  • Robin Howse, Puckett Institute
  • Katy McCullough, FPG Child Development Institute
  • Tracey West, FPG Child Development Institute
  • Mary Bratsch-Hines, FPG Child Development Institute
  • Toni Miguel, UNC-Chapel Hill

Design Team

  • Jonathan Green, FPG Child Development Institute (Lead)
  • Christine Wagner, FPG Child Development Institute
  • Christine Harradine, FPG Child Development Institute
  • Davon Embler, Puckett Institute
  • Kaki Roberts, Puckett Institute

Narrators

  • Adam Holland, FPG Child Development Institute
  • Jonathan Green, FPG Child Development Institute

These modules and resources are based on the work by the Division for Early Childhood (DEC). The contents of the site were developed under grant #H326P120002 from the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), U.S. Department of Education. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the US Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.